All reviews - Movies (24) - TV Shows (1)

Saw VI review

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 3 May 2010 02:53 (A review of Saw VI)

More of the same crap...

The SAW formula is obsolete.

Ps: the only thing "good" about this movie is the attack on the Health Insurance industry ;).

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Bad light; tries do be funny

Posted : 2 years ago on 5 January 2010 06:13 (A review of JCVD)

Although someone can tell me that the saturated lights on this movie were intended to show how Jean Claude always had lived under the media lights, it really damaged the whole movie... it's very difficult to watch with such saturated lights.

I could say the movie is regular, but it could be a lot better.

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Worst movie ever!

Posted : 2 years, 1 month ago on 8 December 2009 05:39 (A review of Shinjuku Incident)

Extremely boring, infantile dialogues, poorly directed, a total waste of time...

How Jackie Chan could agree to act on this movie? Completely piece of crap.

It's amazing how people voted higher notes on this one... :\

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Jason with wrong body movement

Posted : 2 years, 2 months ago on 20 November 2009 02:15 (A review of Friday the 13th)

The Jason actor just don't move the way Jason should move. I mean, Jason movement should not be like a martial art fighter: it should be like Jason, like a freak retarded. :D

And this movie has some "fun" atmosphere that just doesn't fit. We can't take it serious like the original one :D.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Sad, beautiful, poetic and full of hope

Posted : 2 years, 2 months ago on 11 November 2009 06:04 (A review of Home)

"It's too late to be pessimistic".

Let's contribute to avoid more damage to our planet. This movie is very strong and the message is very direct. Watch it! And act now! ;)

0 comments, Reply to this entry

REC for americans?

Posted : 2 years, 3 months ago on 28 October 2009 06:49 (A review of Quarantine)

The original REC was so good, so I don't understand why do a "english-spoken" version. Just because the lazy americans don't want to read subtitles? In the end they put "Based on REC"... :D Come on, it is a total copy and they didn't add anything to the original one...

If you did not watch this neither REC, watch REC please, way better than Quarantine.

0 comments, Reply to this entry

"Uma imagem vale por mil palavras"

Posted : 2 years, 3 months ago on 14 October 2009 06:27 (A review of December)

Se tem uma frase que poderia ser aplicada a esse filme é: "uma imagem vale por mil palavras" :D. Há muita coisa subentendida nesse filme e aí vai depender de quem assiste captar ou não.

Salvo engano, a câmera me lembrou um pouco aquele suspense "Os Estranhos".

Mas enfim, me pareceu um baita de um desabafo do Selton. Bom filme, há muito o que observar nele, mas como não sou muito fã de narrativas lentas, dou nota 7. Acho que no próximo, o Selton poderia investir em um filme com mais diálogos, como acontece no "O Sol tornará a brilhar".

Só meus 2 centavos eheh apenas queria fazer esses poucos comentários.

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Much worst than the first one

Posted : 2 years, 3 months ago on 6 October 2009 07:47 (A review of Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian)

Besides being much worst than the first one, it contains a terrible lie: "the plane was invented by americans". The real inventor of plane was the brazilian Santos Dummont, who created the 14 bis, the first plane which can fly by itself with its own engine and publicy testimonied by people on France:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Santos-Dumont#Heavier_than_air_aircraft

"By 1905 he had finished his first airplane design, and also a helicopter. He finally achieved his dream of flying an airplane on October 23, 1906, when, piloting the 14-bis before a large crowd of witnesses, he flew a distance of 60 metres (200 ft) at a height of two to three metres (10 ft). This well-documented event was the first flight verified by the Aéro-Club de France of a powered heavier-than-air machine in Europe, and the first public demonstration in the world of an aircraft taking off from an ordinary airstrip with a non-detachable landing gear and under its own power in calm weather, proving to the spectators that a machine "heavier than air" could take off from the ground by its own means. With this accomplishment, he won the Archdeacon Prize founded by the Frenchman Ernest Archdeacon in July 1906, to be awarded to the first aviator to fly more than 25 meters".



0 comments, Reply to this entry

Slow and boring

Posted : 2 years, 9 months ago on 14 April 2009 07:58 (A review of Romulus, My Father)

This is a *real* piece of shit. This movie doesn't worth nothing, non the time needed to watch it.

Do not waste your time.

0 comments, Reply to this entry

Just a repetition of the first one

Posted : 3 years, 1 month ago on 17 December 2008 07:09 (A review of The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian)

For me it was just a repetition of the first one: fights, strange creatures and that's all...

And if it's supposed to be for children, it's too violent (although there isn't any blood :D). Otherwise it's too childish, silly. So the viewer doesn't know what public this movie wants to reach.



0 comments, Reply to this entry